DataFlux qMDM v3.0
Field Report


Strengths

  • Graduated approach to MDM – DQ->DG->MDM
  • Quick time-to-value – no per-record or per-domain charges
  • Integrated DQ (incl entity resolution) + quality knowledge DBs
  • Flexible data model – domain-neutral & multi-entity-based
  • Commitment to active data governance & related work flow
  • SAS “deep pockets”, common data mgmt, channel & stability
  • Midmarket CDI references – Actelion , BSN Medical, Carl Zeiss, CPP, Invacare, Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative, …

Weaknesses

  • Modest # of MDM references – DSM, NMBS/Belgian Railways, PPL, The Travel Group, …
  • Modest support & references for product master data
  • Relatively small # of customers adding product master to customer master
  • No references for registry or high-volume transactional MDM implementations
  • Lack of SI channels
  • Nascent BPM/workflow for “policy hubs”